Delete Proposal Edit

Since this wasn't started when the delete tag was put up, in accordance with site policy, I will. I support deletion for reasons stated. Lancer1289 15:34, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, forgot to start the discussion... Just like the Gryll (Blood Pack) article this article also do not contain any unique information to justify an article. Support --silverstrike 15:42, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Support deletion. Another marginal character article trying to circumvent an existing redirect. -- Commdor (Talk) 16:24, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

I don't support deletion, there are a TON of other ancillary characters with about as much involvement in the story that have their own pages. That said, both of these pages need to be written a whole lot better. Ctrl alt belief 03:34, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Other articles have no bearing on this proposal. If you believe this article should stay, then vote accordingly and plead your case for it. My opinions are not set in stone and I changed my opinion when presented with strong enough case. --silverstrike 06:27, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose deletion. He's about at the same level of relevance as Jona Sederis. He's certainly more deserving of an article than Gryll. Mr. Mittens 01:28, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose. I do not understand how Jona Sideris is allowed, and not this page?? Omega958 09:48, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

The Jona Sideris page is now also a candidate for deletion and is no longer an excuse to keep this page (not that it ever was). --silverstrike 11:31, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose. I support Mr. Mittens argument. Hefe 11:13, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Just pointing out to everyone that if you are citing another page as justification for your reasoning, then I highly suggest finding another reason. While the vote is still valid, citing another page is shakey at best for reasoning. There may be things you don't know about why pages exist another others don't/won't. Lancer1289 13:07, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

I've proceeded with deleting the article. I realized that the vote was moot because the article was already titled incorrectly; even if the community had voted to keep it, it could not stand because of the redundant "(Blood Pack)" suffix. A deletion discussion (whether to keep the article or delete it) would have been valid if the article had been created under the proper title first, which currently exists as a redirect. -- Commdor (Talk) 15:50, May 7, 2012 (UTC)